Solar PV
Your IE Says 0.5% Annual Degradation
Actual Data Shows 1.2%
Module manufacturers all claim linear degradation. Your inverter data tells a different story. Is anyone tracking module-level performance?
The Degradation Gap Reality
Independent Engineers model ideal conditions. Your modules face hot cells, soiling, PID, and LID. The gap between modeled and actual degradation is destroying your IRR.
1.2%
Actual annual degradation
0.5%
IE modeled degradation
140%
Faster than warranty
$3.4M
Lost over PPA term
What's Killing Your Modules
Hidden Degradation Factors:
- LID (Light Induced Degradation) in first year
- PID (Potential Induced Degradation)
- Hot spots from cell mismatch
- Soiling beyond model assumptions
- Inverter clipping losses
- Tracker misalignment
- String-level underperformance
What Asset Owners Need:
- Actual vs modeled degradation curve
- Weather-normalized performance ratio
- String-level performance heatmap
- Warranty claim documentation
- Revenue impact quantification
- O&M intervention recommendations
- Repower/reblading economics
SlideStrike Speaks Solar PV
50+ solar metrics, automatically calculated from inverter and weather data.
Performance Ratio
Weather-normalized
Specific Yield
kWh/kWp annual
Degradation Rate
Actual vs modeled
Availability
Technical uptime
Soiling Loss
Cleaning ROI
Clipping Loss
Inverter saturation
GHI/POA
Irradiance tracking
Capacity Factor
Actual vs P50
Questions from Solar Asset Owners
What IPPs and infrastructure investors ask
EXPOSE THE DEGRADATION COVER-UP
True Performance Visibility in 60 Seconds
Know your real degradation rate. Document warranty claims. Protect your investment.
Connects to Also Energy, PowerTrack, SMA
50+ solar KPIs built in
Weather-normalized analysis
Warranty documentation